Are magazine staffs growing? Or is it vanity? Whatever the reasons, it’s no secret that in recent years the number of names on mastheads has risen. Cosmopolitan’s masthead grew from 36 names in 1970 to almost 200 in 2006, for example, while Popular Science’s climbed from 34 to 100 in the same span. Once an exclusive list of top editors and owners, the masthead is now an inclusive space. Contributing editors, interns, ad reps, marketing directors and office managers share in the small-print glory with editors-in-chief and publishers. So do some weirder masthead entries: Annals of Improbable Research, a science satire mag, lists an “Associative Editor;” the geeky Linux Journal lists a “Chef Français;” andAdbusters has a “Dogsbody.”
At just shy of 300 names, Vanity Fairboasts one of the most populous modern mastheads. Perhaps more surprisingly, Forbes is right up there. Yes, a few magazines don’t have a masthead, The New Yorker and The New York Times Magazine most prominently, but those are anomalies—anachronisms, perhaps?—in the name-heavy world of the latter-day masthead. Why so many names? It remains a mystery. We can only ponder: What’s next? The assistant office cat? For the curious, here’s graphic proof of the trend (and 20-year projections):